Opinion

Analysis


Farewell Pope John Paul II

Last week the world was left in mourning after the sad demise of Pope John Paul II, who peacefully passed away at his apartment in the Vatican, after suffering from Parkinson’s disease for some time.
The Pope eventually chose not to go to hospital. He died following high fever caused by urinary infection along with breathing-related illnesses.
The late Pope certainly made an extraordinary human being who was deeply loved by people across the world, for the instrumental role he played advocating for human rights in every corner of the globe, and particularly in uniting the Christian communities of every race and every tongue in all the continents, never has there been such a diligent traveller.
His strong attitudes against communism in Eastern Europe, his stance against abortion and mercy killing of the elderly and the disabled, as well as his opposition to the war in Iraq are some of the things that made him more popular and regarded as a political figure in addition to being a spiritual leader.
In his tribute to the Pope, President George W. Bush said: “The world has lost a champion of human freedom and a good and faithful servant of God has been called home.”
Adding that: “Pope John Paul II left the throne of St. Peter’s in the same way he ascended to it, as a witness to the dignity of human life.”
The love that people felt for the Pope could be seen from the masses of people from various religious faiths that gathered at Saint Peter’s Square in Rome, when it became known that his health was failing.
In Tanzania most people, but especially Catholics, are very saddened by the passing of the person who most people describe as a Servant of God. It’s remarkable that the holy Father had some special feeling for Tanzania; it seems that the last delegation he received was that of Cardinal Pengo.
In his recent book Pope John Paul II spoke widely about harmful activities that the world embraces, such as homosexuality and sexual immorality generally.
May the almighty God keep his soul in eternal peace.
Amen.

back to headline


ZANU-PF’s victory passes without objections

Robert Mugabe’s ZANU-PF won over a two thirds majority in the parliamentary elections last week, and is expected to change Zimbabwe’s constitution to increase its hegemony. The opposition is crying, citing cheating and the country’s crisis is far from over. Mugabe has ruled out a coalition.
Zimbabwe’s neighbours (including Tanzania) approved the election. By doing so they ignored the opposition’s accusation of polling irregularities, and the criticism from the US, Britain and other western countries.
Election observers representing SADC, headed by South Africa, came to the conclusion that the parliamentary elections ‘reflected the will of the people’ despite irregularities in the registration of voters and a biased media reporting in favour of the ruling party.
Even election observers from the African Union approved the elections, and concluded that the level of violence was much lower now than in the elections in 2000 and 2002, which should show that Zimbabwe is taking political steps forward.
The leader for the opposition party MDC, Morgan Tsvangirai, said Mugabe’s victory stemmed from widespread cheating and was deeply disappointed with the election observers from SADC.
“Frankly speaking, I am tired of all of those who take SADC seriously,” said MDC’s general secretary Welshman Ncube.
No observers from the US, Britain, Australia, EU or the Commonwealth attended the elections. According to the Zimbabwean government, they were not welcome because of their hostile attitude towards Mugabe and ZANU-PF, forcing them to rule out the election beforehand.
It is a great shame that SADC and AU cannot be braver and speak the truth about what is happening in Zimbabwe. They are doing Zimbabwe and the rest of the continent a disfavour by protecting and supporting Mugabe’s regime.
For how long can they go on pretending that what is taking place in Zimbabwe (food shortages, silencing of opposition, human rights abuse) is not there?
Opposing Mugabe is not about being in favour of the west trying to tell us what to do; it is about common sense!

back to headline


Analysis

Successful vote rigging unlikely

By Evarist Kagaruki
When Tanzania chose to change from a single party to a multiparty system, there were mixed feelings of both apprehension and optimism among the citizenry. Apprehension because some people honestly believed that having many political parties would usher in an era of chaos, religious and ethnic tensions, animosity and strife, and thus threaten not only the unity, peace and tranquillity which our country has enjoyed since independence, but also the social and economic gains that have been registered.
And optimism because there was the prospect that, with an opposition waiting in the wings to take the reigns of power, the government would become alert and responsive to the needs and aspirations of the population; and that the economy would prosper and the conditions of the poorest in society improve.
Sadly, almost fifteen years down the democracy road, the apprehensive citizens seem to have been vindicated. Now it would be self-delusion to think that we still enjoy our unity, peace and stability the same way we did during the single-party era. Each day brings to the fore the prospect of the danger and nightmare of those pillars of our nation collapsing under the very weight of precipitous pluralism and its concomitant divisive politics.
The divisive politics and hostilities that underlie the relations between members of the ruling party, CCM, and those of the opposition parties, have now become a permanent salient feature of our political culture that appears more pronounced at election time. The electoral politics bring with them into the opposition parties the suspicion and fear that the government is going to rig the elections in favour of the ruling party!
While there is no disputing the fact that in Africa, by and large, election rigging is a problem, it has become something like a “myth” in Tanzania’s multi-party politics. This myth holds so much sway in the psyche of some people that, even when the electoral process was reasonably transparent, and the elections judged as “free and fair” by both the local and foreign independent observers, rigging would still be cited by the opposition as the main reason behind their defeat in the elections that had been won by the ruling party – even when it was a landslide victory!
Interestingly, the faithful in the opposition political parties have been conditioned to believe that CCM “cannot win” without stealing votes!
Recently, the Chairman of the main opposition, Civic United Front (CUF), Prof. Ibrahim Lipumba, was quoted by the press as saying that his party was preparing agents in every constituency in order to check vote thefts. He said that the party agents would be provided with motor-bikes, making their work easier.
Certainly, this is commendable. It puts the party in a better position to monitor the electoral process. All political parties are expected to do the same. The law allows them to post their agents at the registration and polling stations to monitor the process of the elections. If all the political parties intending to participate in the elections next October will do that, then one wonders how the problem of rigging at the polling stations could arise.
Fortunately, in this year’s elections, the introduction of the Permanent Voters’ Register and special voting cards bearing photographs of the prospective voters, by far minimises (in fact almost eliminates) chances of a person voting more than once. It is not fool-proof, but it enhances the credibility of the electoral system.
If only those who have been registered to vote are the ones who will be allowed into the polling booth; and if all the electoral procedures of counting the ballots at the respective polling centres in the presence of the political parties’ agents are adhered to, and the election results (that have been tallied and attested by the agents and election supervisors) published there and then, I can see a very remote possibility of any rigging attempt succeeding.
It defies commonsense when claims of rigging are raised in such a transparent procedure of polling!
Unless the Electoral Commission finally announces controversial election results which contradict the ballot tallies in the constituencies, (as was the suspicion in the 1995 Zanzibar Presidential election results), the fear of “rigging” in our elections seems to be a problem of the mindset.

back to headline